Tuesday, March 24, 2015

Overview: Web Analytics and SEO


Web analytics and Search Engine Optimization (SEO), are established marketing tools for those companies and individuals who want a stronger digital footprint. Obviously, not all companies have the bandwidth to undertake the more sophisticated elements of these tools, but for those who have the resources to do so will see a higher rate in customer conversions and greater market shares.

First, let’s start with the definition of web analytics. Web analytics in its most fundamental definition is analyzing the visitor’s behavior on a website. Google Analytics, the premier web analytic software, uses a variety of methods to create a snapshot of what consumers are doing online, such as "reach, impressions, page views, unique page views, sessions, interactions, engagements, attention ratios, pings, viral scores, buzz scores, and time spent". (Gupta, 2014). These methods are calculated, analyzed to give a marketer a few insights to questions like: Which ad is successful in getting a consumer to the website or purchase? Why is a consumer spending so little or so much time on a particular page? Why does a potential customer navigate away right before the purchase takes place? (Sprinkle, 2015).

From insights (not answers) into these questions marketers can design/change/enhance parts of their web presence by helping marketers to drive more visitors to their website, to turn visitors into leads, to increase the conversion rate of visitors/leads into customers, increase the amount that a customer will spend on a site, and in general, help a business understand their customers more thoroughly. (Reed School of Media, 2015a). 

Google Analytics has a variety of reports that will assist a digital marketer in determining the behavior patterns of their visitors while on the site and also how they got to this site. How are visitors are arriving onto the website is the genesis of understanding customer behavior on the website. Utilizing the Channels and Landing Page report gives a wealth of information regarding how visitors are entering the website.

The Channel report shows how the visitor came to the site. It shows the percentage of social media, organic search, referrals and direct links the various users have used. This helps the marketer identify the main traffic sources to strengthen those efforts and to assist those sources that may be lagging. (Oprea, 2012).

The Landing Page is the first entry point of the visitor, which is not necessarily the home page. The importance in this report shows what is being most searched, shared, etc. and is an important tool for visitor acquisition. The Landing Page report in Google Analytics shows the most highly viewed landing pages over a specific amount of time - dictated by the user. It shows:

1.      "Pages/Visit: The number of pages that a user visits after landing on the initial page.  The higher the number, the more engagement your landing page is promoting.

2.      Avg. Visit Duration: The average length of time a visitor stays on your website.  This number isn’t entirely accurate for a few reasons, but can be useful as a way of comparing page performance relative to other pages.

3.      % New Visits: The percentage of visitors that have not previously visited your website.

4.      Bounce Rate: The percentage of users that arrive on your landing page and leave your website without viewing any additional pages.  A lower bounce rate is generally the goal." (Harstein, 2012)

This data shows which pages are successful for future goal conversions and pages that are in need of improvement.  For instance, a retail ecommerce site should see a spike on a landing page because of a recent new shoe trend. There could be an increase in average visit duration, page visits, etc. Secondly, there is also the issue of performance and pages that are in need of improvement. If there is a high bounce rate for the landing page, this could mean the information was difficult to locate, the page itself was slow to load or the landing page was just not engaging. Marketers would need to revisit this page to see if the keywords/tags were setup properly and look at the overall design of the page.

Once a visitor is on the website, Google Analytics can help the marketer turn a visitor into a lead for future follow-up. There are a variety of ways a website can gather contact information on a visitor: a visitor can fill out a form for more information on a topic, sign up for a newsletter or fill out a “contact us” form. Where, Google Analytics can help offer insights, is through their User Flow and Behavior Flow reports. The User Flow report begins to segment the visitors by geographical location and then shows how those visitors travel throughout the website. The Behavior Flow report is similar but instead of segmenting the visitor by geographic location the visitors are segmented by landing page and then their website travel is documented.

These two reports show paths visitors have taken on the page to the form page. It shows which paths lead a visitor to fill out the contact information form and which paths lead a visitor to abandoning the contact form page. Google Analytics can show all this data, but is up to the marketer to analyze it and comes up with conclusions as to why a visitor did or did not fill out the contact form. Is that the newsletter that is posted on the home page is so interesting most visitors wanted to learn more and that’s why there is a high conversion rate for those who landed on the home page? Or did the visitor become so confused by the company’s history page that once they came to the “contact us” form they just give up and tried another company? (Roberts, 2013). These patterns of behavior will illuminate trends or show room for improvement for webpages that will help a marketer to turn these visitors into potential leads.

While, it is important to generate leads, it is the hope of most marketers to turn leads/visitors into customers, especially on an ecommerce site. While, there are a variety of Google Analytic’s reports that would shed insight onto this problem, there are two reports that would be specifically helpful for an ecommerce website: Mobile and Ecommerce.

Obviously, the Ecommerce report makes sense, but why the Mobile Report? There are a lot of challenges when it comes to mobile site versus a full site with liquid layout. The factors of cost and time may squash the conversation all together.  However, if the business has the ability to create these sites, then Google Analytics makes this decision easier between mobile sites or full functioning sites through the Mobile report. This report gives the number of sessions, the percentage of new sessions, new users, bounce rate, pages/sessions, average session duration, and goal conversions for the various devices that are being used to view the website. This means if there is a high rate of users utilizing mobile devices it would be pertinent for a business to research whether customers want a mobile site or a full functioning website. Either way, the data will show a decision needs to be made. 

Just because there is data showing a lot of mobile traffic, there are differences among the various mobile platforms, especially between tablets and smartphones. In 2014, on Cyber Monday, mobile web traffic consisted of 28.5 % for smartphones and 12.5% for tablets. However, the sales metrics between these two devices switch where 19% of all sales were tablets and 9.1% for smartphones. Of course, looking at the conversion rates is essential to this process, but the mobile percentages would help the marketer determine the type of layout/design in order to maximize the conversion rates for mobile platforms. There are a variety of strategies, ApplePay, PayPal, etc., that will help in conversion process, but first learning the percentages of types of mobile users will be a greater asset in knowing if it is first needed. (Walters, n.d.).

Once a marketer understands the type of screen their visitor is using, it will assist the marketer in creating a seamless purchase experience for the customer no matter the screen size. Even though percentage wise smartphones lag behind tablets in sales, if only 5% of customers are utilizing a PC to view a site then it would make sense for a marketer to rethink their purchase path to be more mobile friendly in order to have higher customer conversions.

The more obvious report, Ecommerce, will also give insights into turning leads/visitors into customers. The reports within the Ecommerce heading are Overview, Product Performance, Sales Performance, Transactions and Time to Purchase. Specifically, the Time to Purchase report creates very telling data on how to increase conversion because in the report it shows the number of days and sessions it takes to complete a purchase, beginning with the most recent campaign to the last finished transaction.  This data gives a snapshot of how long it takes a customer from their first entry point onto the website to when they finally make the decision to purchase the item and also how many sessions. Analysis of these trends may show repeat sessions are a product of a poorly designed website and it takes customers a few times to get through the process. (Google Support, n.d. a)

After, a marketer has increased leads and increased customers utilizing Google Analytics, it is now time to increase the amount a customer will spend while on the website. Again, Google Analytics has a number of reports that will help in this process but specifically, Product Performance and Sales Performance are essential to this analysis.

The Product Performance report summarizes the cash flow, price and quantity of items purchased and the behavior of the customer while looking for a product to purchase. How many products or webpages did a customer look at before the made the purchase? Was there indecisiveness of adding and removing products from the shopping cart? What is particularly telling is how many products were viewed versus how many were put into the cart, and how many products were viewed versus how many purchased. Is there a correlation between viewing more items to purchasing more items? If this is so, the website should encourage more product browsing by advising on complimentary items to the one being viewed.

The Sales Performance report is a little more basic and instead shows the transaction revenue (including shipping and tax), quantity, refund amount and the date. This data will give a great overview of buying trends and returns. If the marketer wants to maximize customer’s spending, then decreasing returns is important and understanding purchase trends will assist marketers in making strategically advantageous decisions. (Google Support, n.d. b)

In general, Google Analytics reports will provide a great overview customer’s needs and behaviors, which will in turn allow the marketer to better respond to customer’s needs. Not only is it important for a marketer to create a great user experience while they are on the website, it is also important for a marketer to make it easy for a customer to find the website utilizing keyword searches. As mentioned above, the genesis of customer behavior starts with how the customer arrived on the site. If it is through a search engine keyword search then a marketer took the time to build search engine optimization.

Search engine optimization (SEO) is the process of receiving free traffic to a website through keyword searches on a search engine. The hope for marketers is to have a high ranking on a search engine results page (SERP). In order for a marketer to receive a high ranking on a SERP they need to build on-page and off-page optimization.

On-page optimization is keywords, URLs, tags and code that reinforce a series of keywords dictated by the website creator. An example of an on-page optimization technique is to create keyword-specific tags. A tag, in short, is a keyword. The longer definition (and more accurate definition) is that it is a keyword associated with metadata that describes the content, item, and/or image to make it easier for an individual to search for specific types of content. Metadata can be included in images and videos. For instance, on a blog, a blogger should define these keywords and place them in the description, blog title, URL, etc. Or you can add information via Javascript on the page through “title”, “keywords”, etc. (Cutroni, 2012).

An example of an off-page optimization technique is social media. For instance, Facebook and Twitter are strong indicators for high website rankings. When followers or interested parties share your link via social media the higher your website will be for Google's ranking. There is also ranking among the different social media websites, Facebook has 0.37 and Twitter is 0.25. (Searchmetrics Analysis, 2012 & Reed School of Media, 2015b)

Not only can inbound links and link sharing on social media help with SEO, but the content on the social media site can as well. Creating authentic and related content to the website will also help in keyword and meta tag reinforcement. If due diligence was performed, the brand/website will have followers who will read this great content and hopefully share it. It is important to note, Google's crawlers index websites and social media sites equally. (DeMers, 2015).

This makes sense, the more the content is spread throughout the web the more indexed it is and this includes social media. If individuals share a link/story/video that includes the meta data about the content, the more reliable the link can become and the more it is noticed by Google's webcrawlers.

What is not noticed by Google's web crawlers is how many times a link/story/video is “liked”. Eric Eng, president of Stone Temple Consulting, performed a study where he created "two different web pages on three different domains, he had friends and Fiverr users drive likes to each of the pages. Despite each of those pages being liked nearly 900 times each, Google never crawled are indexed any of the six pages. So Google clearly is not using Facebook likes to discover or index new content."

However, as for the actual counting of the "likes" it does not seem to affect SEO. This is because the Google webcrawlers cannot see the "Facebook Like" html and cannot see the originator of the "like". Google wants to see the source of links so it can assign trust or score to the link, but since they can't see who posted the link or "like", Google cannot assign a score. Therefore, it cannot determine if it is a real person or a fake Facebook profile.  (Slegg, 2013)

            For a strong SEO strategy it is important to combine on-page optimization and off-page optimization in order to gain a higher ranking on a SERP. In order to do this a marketer needs strong keyword reinforcement through metatags, URLs, etc. so they search engine indexes the website at a higher level for those keywords. Also, it is important to have inbound links from social media and other websites that again reflect the authenticity and value of the website from our sources.

            Once a person is able to find the website it is up to Google Analytics to give insights on how to keep visitors coming and to stay interested in the website to achieve whatever goals the marketers has set forth. SEO can only get the visitor to the website and it is up to Google Analytics to convert the visitor to a lead and/or customer, to increase customer spending and in general understand the needs of the customer.

Web anaytlics and SEO are powerful tools for a digital marketer to understand another aspect of their potential customer, current customer and customer behavior. It provides insights into emerging trends and ways in which their customer’s needs are evolving.

With this said, is it important for a company to base decisions on web analytics? Yes, if it is only a part of the answer. Web analytics is an established tool, but still fairly young compared to other marketing tactics. So, a company should not disregard 80 years of market trends because the past 2 years of web analytics tell them to go a new direction. A digital marketer should still understand that web analytics is still a sample of the marketing mix and to not throw away past marketing strategies because it is in conflict with the analysis of web traffic.

Thursday, March 5, 2015

Insights into SEO and Web Analytics... Not for the faint of heart! : Matalan and the Google Analytics!

Insights into SEO and Web Analytics... Not for the faint of heart! : Matalan and the Google Analytics!: Matalan The word of retail is a fickle industry based on fashion trends, purchase habits and constantly changing customers tastes. Matal...

Matalan and the Google Analytics!

Matalan

The word of retail is a fickle industry based on fashion trends, purchase habits and constantly changing customers tastes. Matalan, a UK based, retail company knows this better than anyone else. This company was the darling retail company of the 1980's and 1990's. The company had high end fashion at economical prices - it was the beginning of the "discounter" customer. 

Below is a TV advertisement for Matalan, featuring their Christmas inventory:


For years, Matalan was unchallenged in the sector. However similar modeled retail stores began to spring up around Matalan, WalMart and Tesco, and their hold on the market began to loosen. The company made poor marketing choices, did not have stock to meet demand and poor choices on increasing prices - drove stock prices down. 

What is interesting about this company is that it was able to pull itself out of the hole and negative brand image to become more profitable through a variety of tactics: strengthened it's brand, maintained the original price points while still reinforcing the great strengths of the products, created more fashionable lines and built partnerships with more contemporary brands and fashion. (Jardine, 2004) One example of this change in 2013 was the launch of the Intersport Sporting Pro brand, an athletic apparel line focused on women, capitalizing on the athletic wear as contemporary wear trend. (Breakfast briefing, 2013)

Along with these rebranding choices, Matalan utilized online analytics to bring about these positive changes. First, Malatan has a brick and mortar store, and an e-commerce website that is an extension of the store offering the entire catalogue to online customers.  In order to make this e-commerce website effective and successful, Matalan looked for an analytics platform that would streamline the processing of data, save time in processing and distributing data, provide insights to market trends and generally delivery quality data about the effectiveness of the site that would determine the trajectory of the website. Enter Google Analytics!  

In order to this, Malatan hired Morpheus Media to implement DoubleClick Campaign Manager,  a Google program that assists companies in managing their online ads and ad serving.  This program has a dashboard that shows reports from websites and mobile, including "ad serving, targeting, verification, reporting, and attribution modeling." - a program that gives oversight to the entire online advertising campaigns. This centralized display of their digital marketing gave Matalan a new perspective on their e-commerce website. According to Adam McCann, Online Search & Affiliate Assistant for Matalan:

"This gives us the ability to see the hidden power of different channels. One of the most interesting things about the DoubleClick Campaign Manager integration has been around assisted conversions. It’s really helpful to be able to see one channel that might not be a heavy hitter in terms of revenue or traffic has an impact in creating a conversion on another channel." 

Matalan also began to utilize Google Analytics Premium to analyze the successes and room for improvement of their digital advertising and goal conversions.  Lee Pinnington, Matalan's Multi-Channel Marketing Director, commented:

“One of the great things about Google Analytics Premium is that the processing power is much quicker. That’s useful in making real-time decisions on things that can impact us that day. It’s also really helpful to be able to see one channel that might not be a heavy hitter in terms of revenue or traffic has an impact in creating a conversion on another channel. The move to Google Analytics Premium means we are able to unlock data that we can trust with minimal resource to drive real-time decisions. UK retailers are very elastic businesses; we need to get data and make decisions to target our user base quickly with promotional activity to grow our sales."

More specifically, Matalan found the functionality of capturing unsampled data, quick access to data and the opportunity of 50 Customer Variables in Google Analytics to be extremely helpful. Due to this functionality, Matalan was able to make many positive changes to their website: 

1. Created a portal to search for products, so that Matalan could capture the data on what the customers were searching for and could not find on the website. 
2. Implemented a "Forgot Password Funnel" for customers. This was created to help in the coversion process, in case the customer forgot their password in the check out process. 
3. Use the report, virtual pageviews, to understand where potential drop off points were and why. 
4. Compared anonymous and registered visitors by utilizing the event function in Google Analtics and create a Quick Shop ID code  and user type.
5. Utilized custom variables to view product success through the shopping cart page 
6. Created reports specific to the landing page to understand potential downfalls in their digital marketing plan 

This combination of  DoubleClick Campaign Manager and Google Analytics Premium gave workable insights to Matalan on how to use their marketing tactics more effectively. Utilizing these two platforms together, Matalan can perform more analyses across various platforms, can create new marketing plans much faster, follow traffic and device sources, sales, conversions, and was able to identify which products were viewing well and what products or pages that were not viewing well. The end results were s a 28% rise in conversion rate, with a tremendous spike in site visits and revenue. 


Resources:

Breakfast briefing: Retail news on matalan and spar UK.(2013). Retail Week, Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1425297478?accountid=2837

Google (n.d). DS OVERVIEW: DoubleClick Campaign Manager (DCM). Google Support. Retrieved on March 1, 2015 from: https://support.google.com/ds/answer/3437333?hl=en

Google Analytics (n.d.) Matalan: After implementing Google Analytics Premium, Matalan sees a 28% increase in conversion rate. Retrieved on March 1, 2015 from: http://static.googleusercontent.com/media/www.google.com/en/us/analytics/customers/pdfs/matalan.pdf

Jardine, A. (2004, Jun 23). Matalan. Marketing, , 24. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com/docview/214972781?accountid=2837

Thursday, February 26, 2015

Google and Privacy Laws

Google and Privacy Laws 
 
Google and many services like it, over free applications, such as email, analytics, search portals, etc., in hopes of attracting users to their site, collecting their information and then monetizing their personal information to help in marketing and advertisements. This is a fairly standard practice among these large internet giants that unbeknownst to some users, their information is being collected and potentially sold to companies without their verbal or signed consent. Instead consent is implied by using these services. Is this an ethical path for a company like Google?  
First, how does Google track this information? Google, across mobile and desktop, gathers information utilizing a third-party tracking tool, such as DoubleClick (a large ad network), who then sells the data to other advertisers. Essentially, Google owns the data but DoubleClick sells the data to marketers. In order to gather this information Google and DoubleClick utilize code, such as cookies, spyware or Web Bugs. For an example on how these work, Web Bug is a piece of code that allow advertisers to track information invisibly since it is not stored on the computer. They can even track a user from one website to another website and can even see how down a user scrolls on a page. (Goldfarb & Tucker, 2011). 
Now that we understand how Google is collecting the information, what has been the public and government's response? One of the first laws/cases regarding this issue in the United States was in the "Do Not Track Online Act of 2011". The proposed bill wanted to bolster the FTC (Federal Trade Commission) to create lows on the collection and use of user's information. Unfortunately, the law was not enacted. (Erramilli, 2012).   
Abroad, specifically in Europe, have had more success instilling tougher laws on internet privacy. Below are a few examples of these laws and initiatives: 
  • European Union: “Privacy and Electronic Communications Directive”: This law, originally passed in 2002 with amendments continuing through 2011, manages internet services and users' rights with electronic communications and services. It also manages the storing and mining of personal data and protects the privacy of all users. It is up to the government to enforce these consumer protection laws.  (Directive 2009/136/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Nov. 25, 2009)  
  • France: June 2004, “Trust in Computer Processing in the Economy Act": This act manages internet services and users' privacy in relation to electronic communications and services. It is meant to protect personal data and privacy online. It is up to the government to enforce these laws. (Directive 2009/136/EC, Article L. 34-5 of the Code of Post and Telecommunication) 
  • Germany: June 2005, Telecommunications Act in 2005 and then replaced by the German Telemedia Act in 2007: The original 2005 Act was to establish parameters for the exchange of electronic information and online communication. The Act of 2007 kept the majority of the 2005 Act intact with the exception of a few consolidations or programs.  The purpose of this Act is to establish uniform economic conditions for the various applications of electronic information and communication services. (Sokoll & Enaux, 2007) 
  • Italy: January 2004, The consolidated Data Protection Code: This act encourages companies to use non-personal data whenever applicable, to notify the user when possessing high risk data and for websites to have a "complaint" section for users to give feedback. (Data Protection Code - Legislative Decree no. 196/2003)
 
Along with a public response there has been a private response to companies tracking your personal information. Private companies like mydex.org and i-allow.com offer a paid service to work in-between the marketers and the users. These companies work with the users to signal acceptance to the marketers that they are allowed to use the user’s information. (Goldfarb & Tucker, 2011). 
There is a lot of momentum around the protection of user data and privacy, which I believe is the correct pathway. However, even with all these public and private stances on limiting data mining, I do not find it unethical. I am receiving a multitude of services in exchange for how I shop, what I click through, how long I stay on a page, what my profession is, etc. All information I willingly give on Facebook and would probably tell any acquaintance. In fact through my blog I am mine data every day, I see how often users read my blog, how long they stay on my page and while I don't sell their data to someone else, I have used this data to make my blog more effective and more well-read. You cannot expect to receive all of these services without any form of payment.  If I do not agree to these terms then I will not use their services, as I would with any other service agreement. 
However, for those who do want to more energy put towards verbally or written internet user consent there are a few potential solutions. 
  1. Google and other content providers could provide an options where they can charge for using the website/services and in return would not collect personal data on the user. However, the allure of free services probably trumps any service from doing this. 
  1. Users can install browser blocks, like adblock, to block content providers from mining their information and data.   
  1. For some browser, there is a "do not track" option, which one could indicate in order to not have their information mined. (Chrome does not support this option, surprised?) 
  1. Companies, like Privad, offer a solution where the most personal data stays to the device. It is a transactional privacy where the user can share information that they want and the user gets paid for what they share.  (Erramilli, 2012) 
 
Even though I have described a variety of public and private methods to preserve privacy, and even methods for a user to personally preserve their information I do not find it unethical for companies like Google to track and sell my data. These companies should receive compensation for their services and gathering data is their preferred method. I personally benefit from their practices and even take part in these practices to increase the readability of my blog. Also, it is not up to the company to hand hold users into what a service agreement is and should be up to the user to figure out what they are paying and what they are getting in return. However, I am glad there are resources for individuals who are not comfortable with their personal information being shared, and that is what is great about the internet - it is up to you whether you want to use it and how to use it.  
 
 
 
References: 
Directive 2009/136/EC, Article L. 34-5 of the Code of Post and Telecommunication 
 
Directive 2009/136/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Nov. 25, 2009 
 
Erramilli, V. (2012). The tussle around online privacy. IEEE Internet Computing, 16(4), 69-71. doi:10.1109/MIC.2012.92 
 
Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. E. (2011). Privacy regulation and online advertising. Management Science, 57(1), 57-71. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1100.1246 
 
Sokoll, K & Enaux, C. (2007). Germany - New Telemedia Act Introduced. Linklaters. Retrieved on February 23, 2015 from: http://www.linklaters.com/Insights/Publication1403Newsletter/PublicationIssue20070324/Pages/PublicationIssueItem2217.aspx 
 

Wednesday, February 18, 2015

Response to: Web Metric Musings: What's your solution? Google Analytics vs. Adobe A...

With that price tag, is Adobe Analytics really an alternative to Google Analytics based off of ROI?



Web Metric Musings: What's your solution? Google Analytics vs. Adobe A...: Google Analytics (GA) is a free, (relatively) easy to use tool for measuring Web metrics.   Some say that it’s the best option fo...

Tuesday, February 17, 2015

Exploring Web Analytics & SEO: Can Clicky Compare?

Exploring Web Analytics & SEO: Can Clicky Compare?: With Google’s reputation, it’s no surprise that the 2013 Econsultancy/Lynchpin Online Measurement and Strategy Report ...



This is an interesting blog that really shows the shortfalls of GA and highlights the successes of a competitor  - Clicky!

Chartbeat Versus Google Analytics, is there a comparison?


Chartbeat Versus Google Analytics, is there a comparison?

There is a highly competitive world in web analytics, a dizzying array of free software, subscription-based software and one-time purchase software for a website manager to sift through hoping to find some type of clarity on who is visiting their website. The best known of these tools is the monolith - Google Analytics (GA). This is really a fantastic tool, but there are other types of software out there that offer a greater level of specificity that GA is not able to offer. In comes Chartbeat.

Before, we get into the differences between the two, let’s first define the offerings of Google Analytics and Chartbeat.

Google Analytics


 How does it work?

Google offers lines of Javascript (a.k.a. tracking code) to the webmaster/marketer to place into the website that sends data back to Google about visitors and visits. The huge data center at Google then takes the information and sends it back out to the webmaster/marketer in the forms of graphs, numbers and charts - hopefully in an easily understandable format. (Farney & McHale, 2013a)

The information sent back are displayed through a variety of reports, here is an overview of those reports:

Report Types 


Real Time

Audience

Acquisition

Behavior

Conversion

Definition: Data on the people who are using the Website at that moment.
Definition: A report that gives you an overview on your visitors to the site
Definition: The origins of the traffic to the site, how is it getting there?
Definition: How people navigate your site or how they interact on the site.
Definition: User defined successes, reports are empty until a goal is created.
Types of Reports:
Types of Reports:
Types of Reports:
Types of Reports:
Types of Reports:
Overview
Overview
Overview
Overview
Goals
Locations
Cohort Analysis
All Traffic
Behavior
Ecommerce
Traffic Sources
Demographic
Ad Words
Site Content
Multi-Channel Funnels
Content
Interest
Search Engine Optimization
Site Speed
Attribution
Events
Geo
Social
Site Search
Conversations
Behavior
Campaigns
Events
Technology
Ad Sense
Mobile
Experiments
Custom
In-Page Analytics
Benchmarking
User Flow


(Farney & McHale, 2013b)

(Reed School of Media, 2015)

(Weiss, 2013)

As it is shown, Google Analytics is a robust tool that has created a number of filters, customization tools and goal settings to create reports that produces solutions for the eager marketer. The abilities of these reports are far reaching and should be investigated further if looking for specific information. However there are a few drawbacks to this tool that makes the reporting inaccurate and does not grab the whole picture.

·        The data that is generated is owned by Google, not great for those who are concerned with privacy

·        Data is only 25 months old, after that it is deleted from the reports

·        If you are an international company dealing with variable currencies, check to make sure GA supports those currencies

·        If you have multiple profiles you cannot cross compare

·        Only 25 goals per profile

(Patel, 2013)

Chartbeat


Who is Chartbeat?

Chartbeat is an analytics software that is a perfect marriage for content marketers. For those who own blogs or other editorial webpages this is a great tool for understanding how viewers are interacting with the content. It offers synchronous web traffic data combined with audience behavior data to show a holistic report on what elements are the most engaging on the website. It also shows what links are most popular in real-time so that you can quickly create content that is trending right now.

Report Types


        There are four report types within Chartbeat: Overview, Content, Social, Traffic Sources and Geo. However, rather than going through each of these reports as shown with Google Analytics, instead I intended to show the reports that differentiate Chartbeat with GA and give an overview of their functionality. 

Audience

Video

Definition: Overview of visitors
Definition: This report gives analysis on videos on the website.
Types of Reports:
Types of Reports:
Recirculation: How many if your returning or unique visitors read more than one article during one session
Play Rates: How many times a video is being played
Engaged time: This report shows what visitors are doing on a page, are they reading, commenting or being idle? How far did the person scroll down, were they moving their cursor around?
Lengths of Views: Are the users watching all the way through? Where do they stop?
Visitor frequency: How many times does a visitor come back.
Comparison: How does one video stand up to the other videos on the website

(Angeles, 2014)

(Dockterman, 2014)

How else does Chartbeat differ from GA?

First, Chartbeat is not as robust as GA nor does it have the wealth of customer feedback data that GA has, and the company knows this, so instead it has opted for a more niche market. This software is for those who want real-time specificity, are utilizing a multitude of media tactics and need quick and holistic data for those "game-time decisions".

One of the biggest differences between GA and Chartbeat is that they focus much more on engaged time: measureable time that the user is reading or engaging with the content. Chartbeat is able to do this by pinging the website every second versus utilizing timestamps, which GA does.  Chartbeat can measure which window is the active window (not just timestamping a window even though it is a hidden window in a long series of tabs), which pixels are in plain view (above the fold or below the fold) and how the reader has been interacting with the website by what they have clicked, how many times they have scrolled or how far they have scrolled within the past five seconds. This data can give an accurate real-time view of how users are engaging with the content, which will hopefully lead to maximizing attention. (Tornoe, 2014).

Secondly, Chartbeat has personalized dashboards for the various individuals managing the website. This is great for a website that has multiple bloggers working on a site who want to see the reports on their particular blog. If this blog has video and other customized reports it really helps this blogger to be able to change their layout around so it suits their needs.

This is a really fantastic analytics tool as well and can really give in-depth analysis for the right type of website. However, with any software there are drawbacks:

·         Not a free software, costs around $10/month

  • Niche market without the same diversity of offerings (e.x. if the website does not have social media links or videos - not the analytics tool for you)

(Angeles, 2014)

Conclusion

For the average marketer, Google Analytics provides more than enough data and analysis to help the marketer make intelligent and market savvy decisions on how to improve their website. However, if you work in an industry that needs real-time data and is content driven, GA will not be enough for you. For bloggers, journalists, and social media gurus, Chartbeat is the tool. It can give the content engagement analysis in real-time, which will help create trending content.

References:

Angeles, S. (2014). 3 Google Analytics Alternatives (and Why You Should Use Them). Business News Daily. Retrieved on February 16, 2015 from: http://www.businessnewsdaily.com/6090-google-analytics-alternatives.html

Dockterman, E. (2014). People Aren't Actually Reading the Stories They Tweet. Time.Com, 1.

Farney, T., & McHale, N. (2013a). Implementing Google Analytics on Different Platforms. Library Technology Reports, 49(4), 9-15.

Farney, T., & McHale, N. (2013b). Goal Setting. Library Technology Reports, 49(4), 32-38.

Patel, M. (2013). Google Analytics limits and (possible) disadvantages. MatraXis. Retrieved on February 16, 2015 from: http://www.matraxis.co.uk/blog/google-analytics-limits-and-possible-disadvantages/#sthash.6zjTuFgl.dpuf

Reed School of Media. (2015). Lesson 5: Google Analytics. Retrieved Feb 16, 2015 from www.ecampus.wvu.edu

Tornoe, R. (2014). Aiming for 'Engaged Time'. Editor & Publisher, 147(8), 26-27.

Weiss, T. R. (2013). Google Launches Real-Time API Beta for Deeper Marketing Data. Eweek, 1.